vs. Slide Decks The Framework Decision Scorer Why It Works Test a Decision
The Growth Decision Framework™

Make growth decisions
you won't regret.

Most growth decisions are made on gut feel and optimism. This framework gives you a simple, honest process for working through the real numbers, the real risks, and what you're actually committing to — before you commit.

Test a Decision Now See the Framework
5
Simple Steps
5
Things to Check
1
Key Question
3
Outcomes: Go / Redesign / No
Why not another slide deck?

A tool that actually helps you decide — not just think

Most strategy documents give you a framework to admire but nothing to use. This gives you a live tool you can run on any real decision, right now — and walk away with a clear answer.

📊
The Usual Approach
✕
You read it once, nod along, then file it away and forget it
✕
The thinking lives with the consultant — not with you or your team
✕
Generic frameworks that don't fit your specific situation
✕
No way to score or compare options — just opinions dressed as conclusions
✕
Focused on what sounds good — not on what will actually hold up
✕
Everyone leaves with a different takeaway — nothing is actually decided
VS
⬡
This Framework
✓
Works on any real decision, right now — takes 20 minutes to run through
✓
Your whole team uses the same process — so everyone is evaluating the same way
✓
Five plain questions that work for any growth decision you face
✓
A live scoring tool that gives you a real number — not just a gut feel
✓
Built-in check: does this actually build something lasting, or just look good now?
✓
Clear output: Go / Rethink / No — your team leaves knowing exactly what was decided
How It Works

Five questions. One honest answer.

Tap any step to see the questions it asks and what you'll have at the end of it.

1
What are we actually deciding?
Name the real decision — not the version that makes everyone comfortable.
Strong
2
What could go wrong — and for who?
Best case, worst case, and what breaks downstream — on your team, your cash, your focus.
Strong
3
Can we actually afford this?
Put real numbers on it. How much cash, how long to see a return, and what happens if it takes twice as long?
Financial Gate
4
Will this still matter in 3 years?
Does this build something lasting — reputation, capability, systems — or does it have to be re-earned every year?
The Key Test
5
What are we actually signing up for?
Before you say yes — name what has to be true for this to work, and what you'll do if it doesn't.
The Final Check
Step 1 — What are we actually deciding?
Most owners already know what they want to do before they've framed the decision properly. This step slows that down — in a good way. Get the decision out of your head and into plain words that someone with no context could understand. Then add a time horizon: growing over 18 months looks very different from growing over 5 years.
What this step requires
  • A decision statement that a neutral third party could understand
  • Explicit time horizon — by when, over what period
  • Who has voice, who has vote, who is the final decision-maker
  • What would make this decision reversible vs. irreversible
Output
→ A decision written in plain language
Why this matters
  • If you can't write it clearly, you haven't decided what you're deciding yet
  • A 5-year growth move and an 18-month growth move need completely different plans
Step 2 — What could go wrong, and for who?
Most decision processes only ask "what if it works?" This step asks the harder question: what breaks if it doesn't? And what gets stretched even if it does? Your team, your cash, and your focus are the three things that get hit hardest by a growth decision that's bigger than you planned for.
What this step requires
  • Best case, worst case, and most likely case modelled explicitly
  • Hidden assumptions surfaced and named (not left implicit)
  • Second-order effects on: team capacity, cash runway, strategic focus
  • Opportunity cost — what are we not doing if we do this?
Output
→ A clear picture of the upside and the downside
Why this matters
  • The problems most owners discover at month 6 were visible at month 0 — if they'd looked
  • Naming your assumptions before you commit means you're not surprised when they turn out to be wrong
Step 3 — Can we actually afford this?
This is where good ideas meet reality. Before you commit, you need to know: how much cash does this actually need, when do you see a return, and at what point does it start paying for itself? Not estimates dressed as certainty — honest ranges.
What this step requires
  • Cash required to reach the next value milestone
  • Time-to-return estimate with a low and high range
  • Break-even threshold — what does success minimally look like?
  • Sensitivity: what variable, if wrong, kills this decision?
Output
→ Real numbers on the cost and the return
Why this matters
  • Most decisions that go wrong weren't bad ideas — they just ran out of cash before they had time to work
  • Knowing your most fragile assumption early means you can watch it closely — or change the plan
Step 4 — Will this still matter in 3 years?
This is the question most business owners never ask. Growth that builds something lasting — a better reputation, stronger systems, a team that gets better over time — is fundamentally different from growth that just adds revenue this year. Both feel good. Only one compounds.
Ask yourself
  • Does this build something that keeps working — systems, reputation, capability — or does it need to be re-earned every year?
  • Will the benefits still be there in 3 years, or do they fade?
  • Does saying yes to this open more doors — or close them?
  • Does this make the business tougher when things get hard?
  • Does this make the business worth more — not just earn more this year?
Output
→ Go / Rethink / No
Why this matters
  • "Rethink" is the most useful answer — it means the idea is good but the structure isn't. Don't throw it away, redesign it
  • The scorer gives you a number so you can compare options honestly, not just debate them
Step 5 — What are we actually signing up for?
Before anyone says yes, this step makes sure everyone in the room is agreeing to the same thing. It sounds obvious. It almost never happens. This is where you name what has to be true for this to work — and what you'll do if it doesn't.
Before you commit, answer these
  • Can we undo this if it goes wrong — or is this permanent?
  • Write down exactly what we're agreeing to. Not the idea — the commitment
  • If this fails in 12 months, what's the most likely reason? Name it now
  • What would have to happen for us to stop and reassess?
Output
→ Everyone agrees on what was decided
Why this matters
  • Knowing whether you can reverse a decision changes how much risk is appropriate to take
  • Most execution problems start here — people thought they agreed, but they were agreeing to different things
How We Score It

Five things every good growth decision
should be able to answer

Each one is weighted by how much it matters. Together they give you a score — and a clear answer.

Check 01
Does it build something that keeps working?
"Or does it need the same effort every single year to produce the same result?"
Weight: 25%
Check 02
Will the benefits last?
"Or will we be back in this same conversation in two years because nothing stuck?"
Weight: 20%
Check 03
Does this open doors or close them?
"After we do this, do we have more options available to us — or fewer?"
Weight: 15%
Check 04
Does it make us tougher?
"If things get hard next year, does this decision make us more able to handle it — or more exposed?"
Weight: 15%
Check 05
Does it make the business worth more?
"Not just more revenue this year — would someone pay more for this business because of this decision?"
Weight: 25%
Score Your Decision

Rate your decision honestly
across five plain questions.

For each of the five checks, rate how well your decision holds up from 1 to 10. The tool gives you a score and a plain verdict — Go, Rethink, or No.

Your decision
Minimum pass mark (6/10)
Leverage 25%
5/10
▾

Ask yourself these five questions. Count how many you can answer "yes" to — then set the slider accordingly.

  1. Will this decision produce an asset (a system, process, brand, or capability) that continues working after the initial effort is done?
  2. Could the output of this decision be scaled without a proportional increase in cost or headcount?
  3. Does this create a structural advantage that makes future decisions in this area easier or cheaper?
  4. Will this decision reduce our dependency on any single person's time or expertise over the next 12 months?
  5. In two years, will this have made us more able to pursue other opportunities — not just this one?
Durability 20%
5/10
▾

Durability tests whether the value survives. If benefits disappear the moment investment stops, the decision resets — not compounds.

  1. Will the benefits of this decision still be felt in three years without ongoing, heavy reinvestment?
  2. Does this create switching costs, habits, or network effects that make the value sticky over time?
  3. Is the core value of this decision protected from easy competitor replication within 18 months?
  4. Would a significant market downturn reduce the value of this decision, or leave it largely intact?
  5. Does this decision strengthen a relationship, reputation, or capability that compounds with time rather than depreciating?
Optionality 15%
5/10
▾

Optionality measures whether this decision opens or closes future choices. A high optionality decision keeps you in the game for moves you haven't thought of yet.

  1. Does committing to this decision preserve our ability to pursue at least two other significant opportunities in the next 12 months?
  2. If this doesn't work as planned, does it leave us with assets, relationships, or learnings that remain useful?
  3. Does this decision give us access to a new market, channel, or customer segment we currently can't reach?
  4. Is this decision reversible within six months if circumstances change — without unacceptable cost?
  5. Will executing this decision give us better information to make the next decision more confidently?
Resilience 15%
5/10
▾

Resilience tests whether this decision strengthens the business's ability to absorb shocks — or increases its fragility under pressure.

  1. If revenue dropped by 30% for six months, would this decision still look like the right one to have made?
  2. Does this reduce our dependency on a single client, supplier, channel, or technology?
  3. Would this decision make our team stronger, more capable, or more aligned — not just busier?
  4. Does this give us greater pricing power, margin protection, or cost efficiency over time?
  5. If a key competitor copied this decision within 12 months, would we still have a meaningful advantage?
Value 25%
5/10
▾

Value here means enterprise value — what a rational buyer or investor would pay — not just this year's revenue or margin contribution.

  1. Would this decision make the business demonstrably more valuable to an acquirer or investor — not just more profitable this year?
  2. Does this strengthen any of the core drivers of enterprise value: recurring revenue, defensibility, team quality, or market position?
  3. Does this reduce the perceived risk of the business — making future capital cheaper or easier to access?
  4. Will this decision appear in the "why we are different" narrative when we next raise capital or go to market?
  5. If we stopped all other activity for 90 days to focus on this, would the business be worth more at the end of it?

Use the diagnostic questions on the left to calibrate each slider. The score updates in real time.

Leverage 5
Creates systems or assets that multiply over time
Durability 5
Benefits sustain beyond the initial investment period
Optionality 5
Opens more future choices and strategic doors
Resilience 5
Strengthens the business through market cycles
Value 5
Increases intrinsic business value, not just revenue
Compounding Score
50 / 100
Threshold decision — consider redesigning the structure
Why It Works

Built on proven ideas.
Made practical for business owners.

This framework isn't invented from scratch. It draws on some of the clearest thinking ever done on how good decisions get made — and translates it into a process any business owner can use.

⟁
The One Question That Changes Everything
Most growth decisions are judged on how they look this year. This framework asks a different question first: does this build something lasting, or does the value reset every cycle? That one question changes what you decide to do — and what you decide not to do.
What makes this different
✓
It asks whether the value lasts. Most frameworks ask "will this make money?" This one also asks "will this still matter in three years?" — and treats that as the more important question.
✓
It forces you to think about what breaks downstream. Team pressure, cash runway, and strategic focus are built into the process — not left as afterthoughts. Most owners discover these problems at month 6. This catches them at month 0.
✓
Three answers, not just yes or no. Go / Rethink / No. "Rethink" is the most useful answer — the idea is worth pursuing, but not the way it's currently structured. Most processes force a binary that throws good ideas away.
✓
The numbers come before the commitment — not after. Cash requirements, expected return, and break-even have to be on the table before anyone says yes. This stops the most common failure: a good idea that runs out of money before it has time to work.
The thinking behind it
①
Compounding & mental models — Charlie Munger. Munger's latticework of mental models and his emphasis on compounding as the central force in building durable value is foundational to Step 4's compounding test and the five-lens scoring architecture.
②
Howard Marks on "and then what?" Marks taught investors to always ask what happens next — not just what happens first. Step 2 is built on this: what breaks downstream if this is harder than you think?
③
Optionality & asymmetric risk — Nassim Taleb. Taleb's concept of seeking decisions with convex payoffs — limited downside, large upside — underpins the Optionality dimension of the scorer and the reversibility rating in Step 5.
④
Pre-mortem & decision hygiene — Daniel Kahneman. Kahneman's work on cognitive bias and prospective hindsight (the pre-mortem technique) shapes Step 5's closing ritual — specifically the requirement to name the most likely failure cause before committing.
Other thinking that shaped it
⑤
Clayton Christensen on the real job. Christensen asked: what is this decision actually trying to accomplish? Step 1 uses that lens — separating the surface request from the real underlying need.
⑥
Michael Porter on lasting advantage. Porter's question — does this build a position that's hard to copy, or just a short-term edge? — shapes the Durability and Value checks in the scorer.
⑦
Jeff Bezos on one-way and two-way doors. Bezos made this simple: some decisions can be undone, some can't. The ones that can't deserve far more care. Step 5 starts by asking which type of door you're walking through.
⑧
Financial modelling: find your most fragile assumption. Step 3 borrows a standard tool from investment analysis: name the one number that, if it's wrong, makes the whole decision unviable. Then watch it closely.

Have a decision you're sitting on?
Run it through.

It takes 20 minutes. You'll either feel more confident about going ahead — or you'll catch something you hadn't thought through. Either way, you're better off.

Test a Decision Now Review the Framework